ISO 17025 For Testing Laboratory

Home / ISO 17025 For Testing Laboratory

A Recognition of Testing Competence

Testing laboratories seeking ISO/IEC 17025 will be impacted in multiple areas. The main difference between good analytical practices and formal accreditation is the amount of documentation to be developed. There is no doubt that any good analytical laboratory uses qualified analysts, checks the performance of equipment used for testing, and validate methods. However, many times the outcome of the tests is not fully documented. ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation requires formal documented environment – ‘what is not documented is a rumor,’ and is viewed by assessors as ‘not being done.’

The overall impact of accreditation on a testing laboratory can be best illustrated by looking at the whole sample/data workflow. Figure 1 shows a typical laboratory workflow of samples and test data, together with ISO/IEC 17025 requirements.

Compliance Across all Workflow Steps

Validation of analytical methods & Procedures
Equipment calibration testing & maintenance
Qualification of material
Traceablility
Control of nonconforming testing
Qualification of personnel
Controlled environmental conditions
Written procedures

Compliance Across The Laboratory

Documentation control, corrective & preventive actions, complaint handling, suppler & subcontractor management, non-conflicting organizational structure, internal audits

Requirements Overview

Requirements along the analytical workflow

Sampling should be performed according to a sampling plan, and all sample details should be documented
Samples should be uniquely identified and the sample integrity should be protected during transport and storage.
The quality of test results should be monitored.
Test reports should include test results as well as an estimation of the overall measurement uncertainty. The report should also include either detailed information about the sample and test conditions, or a link to a reference document.
Records should be properly maintained to ensure data integrity and availability.

Some requirements impact more than one workflow step

All analytical methods and procedures should be validated. This includes methods and procedures for sampling, testing and data evaluation.
Equipment used for sampling and testing should be calibrated, tested, and well maintained. Material such as calibration standards should be qualified and traceable to System International (SI) units or to certified reference material.
Nonconforming test results should be documented and controlled.
People should be qualified for their assigned tasks through education, experience, or training.
Environmental conditions such as temperature, humidity, and electromagnetic interference should be monitored and controlled.
All routine tasks should be performed according to written procedures.

Some additional requirements impact not only sample analysis, but also the organization of the entire laboratory

Specific documents should be developed and maintained, including individual policies and a quality plan.
Known existing problems should be corrected and an action plan should be developed to avoid recurrence of the same or similar problems.
All complaints from clients should be formally followed up.
A formal program should be used to manage suppliers, service providers, and subcontractors.
The organizational structure should be such that there are no conflicting interests that could impact quality.
Compliance with ISO/IEC 17025 and internal procedures should be assessed during regular internal audits.

Key Steps towards Accreditation

There are eight key steps towards laboratory accreditation

Management defines a project owner
The project owner studies details of the standard, supporting literature, and other relevant information
The project owner defines the preliminary scope of accreditation and works with laboratory professionals to prepare a list with requirements
The project owner and laboratory professionals perform a gap analysis to determine the difference between the requirements and what is currently implemented in the laboratory.
Based on the outcome of the gap analysis, the project owner, laboratory, professionals, financing and documentation professionals, and external consultants estimate the costs for accreditation
Estimated costs are presented to management, along with incremental opportunities.
Management decides to proceed with accreditation.
The project owner leads implementation steps.

Clients
Says

Thanks to the dedicated team for their expertise!

As a calibration laboratory, maintaining the highest standards of accuracy and reliability is critical. Lakshy Management Consultant Pvt. Ltd. were instrumental in helping us achieve ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation. Their team meticulously reviewed our calibration procedures, ensured our equipment met the necessary requirements, and helped us establish traceability to national standards. We were particularly impressed with their practical approach and their ability to explain complex technical concepts in a clear and understandable way. We highly recommend their services to any calibration laboratory seeking accreditation

Lakshy Management excels in ISO 17025 accreditation guidance.

“Achieving ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation was a major goal for our materials testing laboratory, but the process seemed daunting. Lakshy Management Consultant Pvt. Ltd. guided us every step of the way. Their consultants were incredibly knowledgeable about the standard and helped us develop a robust quality management system. They provided practical advice, helped us optimize our testing procedures, and ensured our documentation was impeccable. Thanks to their expertise, we sailed through the accreditation audit and are now confidently providing accurate and reliable testing services to our clients.”

Lakshy Management eased ISO 17025 implementation seamlessly and efficiently.

We were struggling to meet the stringent requirements of ISO/IEC 17025 for our medical testing laboratory. Lakshy Management Consultant Pvt. Ltd. provided the expertise and support we desperately needed. Their consultants helped us improve our risk management processes, implement effective internal audits, and ensure the competency of our laboratory personnel. They were always available to answer our questions and provide guidance, making the entire accreditation process much smoother than we anticipated. We are now a fully accredited laboratory and are confident in our ability to provide high-quality testing services to our patients